|
Common Editorial Mistakes and Style
Mistakes
- Make sure all tables, figures and references are referred
to in the main text. These figures should be placed after
the paragraph where they are first mentioned.
- Do not start
a sentence with “This” and then omit the
subject.
Example:
“This can be the result of energy dissipation within the material” should
read “This observed response can be the result of energy dissipation
within the material.”
- You must use S.I. units.
Even if you developed your experiment using English units you still
need to describe it with S.I. units. Dual units are acceptable with
one set of units in parentheses.
- Figures must reproduce in black and white or gray scale.
- Proper
use of “Since” and “Because”. Since should
refer to time, e.g. “Since the founding of our nation …”
Misuse of since: “Since the mode shapes corresponding to this frequency
indicated that Mass 2 experienced the greatest motion, …” in this example
Since should be replaced with Because.
- All graphs must have their axes labeled and the units identified .
- The
word “data” is plural, datum is singular .
“The data that was collected….” Should read “The
data that were collected.
- Repetitive use of the same word or word form in a sentence :
“The
floor plates were modeled with shell
elements with material properties of aluminum.” Should
read
“The floor plates were modeled with shell elements using aluminum
material properties.”
- Unnecessary use of the preposition “of;” using
the example in 8
“The floor plates were modeled with shell elements
with material
properties of aluminum . ” Should read
“The
floor plates were modeled with shell elements using aluminum
material properties .”
- Keep sentence structure as simple as possible. If
possible, avoid using hyphens, semi-colons and parentheses.
- Avoid the use of relative terms. Quantify
all descriptions of experiments, analyses and results
A large beam
was used to ... "large" is
a relative term, the statement should read:
A 5-cm-square beam 2-m-long was used to...
The first calculated modal frequency agreed well with the
first measured modal frequency. "agreed well" is a relative
term, the sentence should read:
The first calculated modal frequency was two percent greater than the first
measured modal frequency.
- Although there is not a definitive standard, use the third
person in your writing . No I, we, our, etc.
- Try to avoid using the passive form when it
can be changed easily .
“It is demonstrated by the example that the algorithm provides an
accurate solution.” Should read: “The example demonstrates that the
algorithm provides an accurate solution.”
- Every sentence must have a subject and a verb! Listed
below is an IMAC Abstract that violated this rule:
“Examination of
modal parameters for a flat plate for four cases: freely suspended,
plate freely suspended while supported by an oil film, plate fixed
at several locations, and plate fixed at several locations while supported
by an oil film. Investigation of the bending properties of a square
plate on a slip table, particularity with consideration of dampening
provided by an oil film. Comparison of support and dampening characteristics
supplied by an oil film with that provided by equally placed linear
bearings. Analytical and empirical data is contrasted and discrepancies
discussed.”
- Consistent number of significant figures. In the
following table mode 1 resonant frequency is reported to 3 significant
figures while the higher resonant frequencies are reported to 5
significant figures implying that the higher resonant frequencies
can be estimated with much great accuracy. Note that it may require
a detailed statistical analysis to determine just how many significant
figures can accurately be reported.
Table
1 : Frequencies (Hz) of mode shapes from experimental data
and finite element model |
Mode number |
Experimental |
FE Model |
1 |
2.29 |
3.03 |
2 |
3.04 |
3.87 |
3 |
12.57 |
6.76 |
4 |
13.90 |
7.27 |
13 |
120.33 |
126.27 |
14 |
138.89 |
130.10 |
|