Daily
Newsbulletin
Thursday, Dec. 16, 1999
Bulletin Board | Cafeteria
Menu | Calendar
Page
Director's
News | Reader's
Forum | Road
Report
A cooling troposphere and global warming can co-exist
Researchers at the Lab say they may have found a way to dispel a major objection to global-warming theory.
"We want the global-warming community to know that we've identified a possible explanation for why satellite atmospheric temperature and surface temperature trends can disagree," said Charles "Chick" Keller, director of the Lab's Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics (IGPP). "The truth is that the temperature trends probably do agree when you consider the effect that massive ozone depletion caused by large volcanic eruptions has on the stratosphere and upper troposphere."
Keller and his colleagues -- Manvendra Dubey and Howard Hanson of Atmospheric and Climate Sciences (EES-8), and Tracy Light of Space and Atmospheric Sciences (NIS-1) -- are scheduled to present their findings today at the American Geophysical Union's fall meeting in San Francisco.
The researchers set out to explain why scientists have seen less warming in the troposphere, the lowest layer of the atmosphere, than at the surface. If global warming were actually occurring, some scientists have said, observers should be able to document warming trends in the atmosphere as well as on the surface. This doesn't always happen, however, and critics of global-warming theory use the trend disparity to discount the idea that Earth is slowly heating due to a buildup of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and other environmental factors.
Keller and his colleagues on the Lab team looked at existing temperature data gathered by high-altitude balloons and satellites for clues about atmospheric warming trends.
"When you look at the first 13 years of satellite temperature records, you see pretty good agreement with the surface records. But from 1992 to 1997 there is disagreement. During that time, the stratosphere -- the atmospheric layer above the troposphere that contains the ozone layer -- cooled dramatically," Keller said. "We wondered if we could see some factor that would cause this, and that's when we started looking at the June 15, 1991, eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines."
The massive eruption spewed huge quantities of ash and aerosols into the stratosphere. Through a complicated mechanism, volcanic dust enhances destruction of ozone by chlorofluorocarbons already present. Consequently, the eruption led to a wholesale depletion of Earth's protective ozone layer in the stratosphere, which has been observed. Because ozone absorbs the sun's ultraviolet rays, the layer normally heats the stratosphere; but with depletion of ozone from the volcanic blast, the stratosphere cooled.
"We surmise that this very cold stratosphere might have had a cooling effect on the troposphere, the lower atmospheric layer where the weather is," Keller said.
Keller and his colleagues noticed that after the Pinatubo eruption and subsequent stratospheric cooling, surface temperatures and atmospheric temperatures first cooled, then began to rise at comparable rates, but they maintained a temperature differential greater than what had been seen before the volcano.
The observation also led Keller and his colleagues to look at how El Niño and La Niña phenomena affected the atmosphere during the entire satellite record period from 1979 to present. As a general rule, during El Niño years, the upper and lower troposphere see greater warming than the surface, and tropospheric layers see greater cooling than the surface during La Niña years. However, this was not the case after Mount Pinatubo erupted. Keller and his team looked at temperatures during the 1992 El Niño season. The upper troposphere was cooler than expected during that year, indicating that a cold stratosphere nestled directly above may have affected the troposphere.
Moreover, Keller and colleagues noticed that researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology had used a computer simulation with a crude approximation of ozone depletion to look at atmospheric temperatures, and found that the upper troposphere did cool during the aftermath of Pinatubo. The Lab researchers see this as another indication that their tropospheric-cooling hypothesis has merit.
Keller said he and his team next will use Lab computer models of oceans and sea ice coupled with computer models of the atmosphere and land surface developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research to tackle the problem. His research team will plug in 20 years of correct ozone concentrations to see whether the models will arrive at the level of atmospheric cooling measured during the 1992-1997 time frame.
"Critics of global warming hold the hypothesis that global warming doesn't exist because it isn't seen in the atmosphere by satellites," Keller said. "This observation by our team potentially eliminates one of the prime objections to global-warming theory. I think further study could show that ozone depletion keeps the whole system from warming up, which is what you see in the satellite temperature data."
--James Rickman
Los Alamos micro-quakes cause widespread reported effects
Several small, shallow earthquakes near Los Alamos during the past seven years have produced effects normally associated with quakes of much greater magnitude, say geologists and seismologists at the Laboratory.
In a paper scheduled to be presented at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco today, Jamie N. Gardner and Leigh S. House of the Seismic Research Center (EES-1) reported that the effects of the three "micro-quakes" of less than magnitude two were particularly intense in residential areas built on fill or old sedimentary material.
In certain neighborhoods, jolts and loud noise were reported by many households. A pendulum clock stopped, items were knocked off shelves, trees and bushes shook and some homes suffered light plaster damage. The first two events were measured at magnitude two and the third at one and three quarters.
"It's unusual for these magnitude quakes to even be perceived by humans," Gardner said.
The quakes, two of which occurred in February 1991 and the third the day after Thanksgiving 1998, were measured by a small network of seismographs monitoring the near-constant seismic activity along the Northern Rio Grande Rift in New Mexico. The network was established in 1973 as part of the Laboratory's nuclear testing treaty verification capability but is now used by its engineers and earth scientists in a seismic hazards program.
All three earthquakes were extremely shallow, a controversial finding in the seismological world where near-surface rocks are presumed to have too little strength to store sufficient energy to generate an earthquake.
"People think about earthquakes happening at the surface where the effects are observed, but actually they happen at some depth," Gardner said. "These three microquakes were unusually shallow, and consequently closer." Proximity to the epicenter of a quake is one predictor of its felt effects.
Earthquakes are measured on a variety of scales that attempt to describe their magnitude and intensity. Most people are familiar with a scale on which a magnitude seven quake is catastrophic in populated areas and a magnitude two is so minor that it is undetected by most people. Magnitude is a measure of energy released, as detected by seismographs.
The Modified Mercalli Intensity scale was developed to evaluate quake effects on humans and human-made structures. The MMI numbers for the three Los Alamos micro-quakes were from IV to VI, indicating significant felt effects.
"It's a measurement of what happens to people and their stuff. For evaluating potential seismic hazards, it can be more useful because it synthesizes a host of factors," Gardner said. "How big was the quake? How far away? What are the ground conditions and the geology between the person and the quake?"
With the aid of old aerial photographs and maps, Gardner concluded that areas where many residents reported effects of the quake were built on a thick package of old, alluvial material deposited atop the Bandelier tuff, the volcanic rock ejected a million years ago from the Valles Caldera. Residences built directly on a bedrock of tuff were far less likely to feel the small quakes.
Other areas reporting effects had been homestead fields worked before1943. Farmers had used thick topsoils on the tuff to grow crops.
One reason for studying earthquakes and their effects is to use historical data to predict future effects of seismic activity on people and structures. Data generated in the Lab studies can provide perspective with which to interpret anecdotal historical accounts of small earthquakes with large effects, described as far back as the 1800s in England. The Lab's sensitive instruments and population density have given scientists information about the recent seismic events that might otherwise have been misinterpreted.
Ultimately, the information will contribute to efforts to improve safety during seismic events.
"Engineers are the consumers of the information that geoscientists come up with," Gardner said. "It's their job to predict how structures will be affected by seismic activity. Our job is really public safety, and predicting the probable effects from a local quake on facilities at the Laboratory and in Northern New Mexico."
--Kay Roybal
Administrative nonexempt employees receive cash award
PHOTO Don Cobb, associate Laboratory director for threat reduction and chair of the Salary Policy Committee, welcomes administrative nonexempt employees and the OS/GS Subcommittee of the Salary Policy Committee to the Los Alamos Award Program team awards celebration, held last Thursday in the Otowi Building Cafeteria [see the Nov. 8 Newsbulletin].
PHOTO Alex Gancarz, right, of the Quality Improvement Office (QIO) and project leader of the SPC project team, hands Bennie Glover, left, of Nuclear Weapons-Stockpile Systems (NW-SS) a piece of cake at the Los Alamos Award Program team awards celebration. Photos by Sandi Embry
November weather
Last month was one of the warmest and driest Novembers on record in Los Alamos and White Rock, due largely to so-called "La Niña" conditions, according to Laboratory meteorologist George Fenton of Air Quality (ESH-17).
The mean temperature in Los Alamos in November was 44.1 degrees Fahrenheit, while the average daily high temperature of 58 degrees F was 3 degrees F higher than the average record for the month, established in 1942. The mean minimum temperature of 29 degrees F also was 2 degrees higher than average, he said.
A La Niña occurs when equatorial waters off the South American coast cool, affecting the storm track that steers weather disturbances over the United States. When a La Niña occurs, the storm track rises over the northern United States bringing warmer temperatures and reduced precipitation to the southern United States.
Conversely, the so-called El Niño phenomenon causes those same equatorial waters to warm, steering storms over the southern United States and bringing more moisture and colder temperatures, he said.
Fenton said eight high temperature records were established including a string of seven consecutive days, Nov. 11 through 17. On eight other days, the high temperature was within 3 degrees F of tying a daily record, he said.
Only .02 of an inch of precipitation was recorded at the Technical Area 6 measuring station last month, a full one inch below normal for November and the driest in Los Alamos since 1956. A cold front that passed through the area between Nov. 22 and 24 brought snow showers that accounted for all the recorded precipitation, Fenton said.
It was much the same in White Rock in November, with the average high temperature of 61 degrees F well above normal and 3 degrees F greater than the previous average high temperature of 58 degrees F established in 1966.
The mean temperature in White Rock last month was 42 degrees F, slightly below the November mean record, Fenton added.
Eight high temperature records were tied or established in White Rock in November, with six other days within 3 degrees F of also tying daily records. On Nov. 25, the low temperature of 7 degrees F tied a record established in 1993.
Only .05 of an inch of precipitation was recorded at the Technical Area 54 measuring station in White Rock last month, the driest November since 1989.
--Steve Sandoval
|
On today's bulletin board |
|
|
|
Got a news tip for the Newsbulletin? Click here.
Security issues at the Laboratory
Past Daily Newsbulletins
| Last
week's headlines
Searchable database
of past issues
Other news sources
Reflections
| News
Releases | Dateline:
Los Alamos | DOE
Pulse
Diversity Issues | DOE
News | Human Resources
Lab
Memos | Research Library
| UC Connection
Questions? Contact the Newsbulletin at newsbulletin@lanl.gov.
LANL | Phone Book | Search | Help
L O S A L A M O S
N A T I O N A L
L A B O R A T O R Y
Operated by the University
of California for the US Department
of Energy